Justice 4 Brendan
Member's Home Page
184 Posts
Member Since
20/04/2009 14:31:53
POST DATE
04/06/2009 16:01:11 |
While searching the web found this site.
http://karisable.com/crwrong.htm
Worth a look, it is amazing the amount of sites about on Justice and injustice it is a great insight about the wrongs in the judicial.
|
|
"I hear much of people calling to punish the guilty, but few are concerned to clear the innocent" Daniel Defoe 1661-1731
|
admin
Member's Home Page
449 Posts
Member Since
08/04/2009 08:00:00
POST DATE
04/06/2009 16:57:37 |
Have had a quick look at the site and it does have quite an astonishing amount on it though from what I can see its American based so overall won't be all that much benefit to the users of this site. Having said that I do know from the site's web statistics that there are quite a few American visitors so it's worth leaving the link there so as to redirect them to contacts in their area, so thanks for that. For this site though UK based information will be most benefit to its users, we certainly don't have the time or resources to go international.
|
|
|
Justice 4 Brendan
Member's Home Page
184 Posts
Member Since
20/04/2009 14:31:53
POST DATE
05/06/2009 18:05:31 |
Billy i have been leaving them links to UK stories and sites that are fighting Injustice.
Below is another great site for an insight into the madness that is the Justice system.
http://womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/2009/06/blocking-access-to-dna-testing.html
There is so much about Injustice out there i find it can give a better insight and look for similarities in certain cases.
edited by Justice 4 Brendan on 05/06/2009
|
|
"I hear much of people calling to punish the guilty, but few are concerned to clear the innocent" Daniel Defoe 1661-1731
|
admin
Member's Home Page
449 Posts
Member Since
08/04/2009 08:00:00
POST DATE
05/06/2009 18:22:28 |
Hi Brendan,
I do realise what you are saying, however this is a UK site addressing UK issues. While there are comparable instances of note between ourselves and those across the pond, we cannot address the flaws of the UK justice system by highlighting those of the US. Procedures, regulations etc, although in many cases similar (not surprising since the basics are inherited) are not the same and do not apply in this country. It is hard enough for some to understand and accept the differences between parts of UK law without further confusing them with issues of the US.
There are a huge number of cases over there two granted, but with perhaps the exception of studies into expert reliability, or matters which apply equally no matter where a person resides, we need to remain focussed on the issues of the UK. There are pleny here too, a growing number of which are being brought into the public eye which is important.
Billy
|
|
|
Justice 4 Brendan
Member's Home Page
184 Posts
Member Since
20/04/2009 14:31:53
POST DATE
05/06/2009 18:36:45 |
The reason for adding these sites are.
For reading purpose i will be adding United Kingdom based cases on injustice like the case of Simon Hall from Ipswich and others still active getting out there.
In the USA it may be a different court system than ours but it is has meaning as do all cases on injustice.
Inside doubt, English based Miscarraige site.
http://insidedoubt.co.uk/links/C5/
Simon Hall.
http://www.bringsihome.com/
edited by Justice 4 Brendan on 05/06/2009
|
|
"I hear much of people calling to punish the guilty, but few are concerned to clear the innocent" Daniel Defoe 1661-1731
|
admin
Member's Home Page
449 Posts
Member Since
08/04/2009 08:00:00
POST DATE
05/06/2009 20:06:33 |
There is injustice everywhere, that certainly is true. But as your previous link shows, there are sites and organisations which address those issues in America along with ones specific to other countries. This site is UK based therefore its content must remain UK based also, besides to attempt to highlight every case of injustice around the globe on this site would appear to be searching for an argument rather than what the site is specifically here to address which is supporting the wrongly accused/convicted in Britain. So we must insist on links being relevant in this regard in consideration of the sites reputation and the needs of who it is here for.
|
|
|
Justice 4 Brendan
Member's Home Page
184 Posts
Member Since
20/04/2009 14:31:53
POST DATE
05/06/2009 20:49:35 |
Hi Billy i think it relevant myself to visit sites of interest, all be it some are not British based cases.
I will be sticking to British cases as they are many and need exposure.
I am sure any site listed would be happy to link this site and offer it exposure not just in Scotland but further afield.
American cases are sometimes out the ordinary and offer answers to problems we find in our own justice system.
After all was all law not based on Scots law?
|
|
"I hear much of people calling to punish the guilty, but few are concerned to clear the innocent" Daniel Defoe 1661-1731
|
admin
Member's Home Page
449 Posts
Member Since
08/04/2009 08:00:00
POST DATE
05/06/2009 21:14:07 |
Brendan,
The point simply is this, www.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk is a UK site aiming to support and address the needs of the wrongly accused/convicted in our own country. Without wishing to seem rude which I have no desire to be, I simply don't have time to debate the matter further. You have contributed greatly to the forum over the past few weeks/months with many relevant UK links which I greatly appreciate and am sure others do too however as a result of growing popularity we no longer have the same time available to check each link for it's merit on the site. American law may well be based on Scottish/UK law but they it has evolved, is no longer the same and therefore not relevant to current British law overall.
As a point of interest I have upwards of 70 e-mails which I have received to day alone relating to various requests for practical support which is great in terms of how much relevant interest there is in the site and highlights it's worth. But these are UK individuals/cases, if we were to begin receiving others asking for help from out with when it has not been our intention to extend to international affairs we would therefore reduce our capabilities to concentrate on who we should by having to read requests from those who have been mislead into thinking that we would in the first case.
Sorry, but that is the position of the site, in the best interests of the site and those who need it. I'm afraid further links relating to matters overseas will simply have to be deleted without further comment to reduce the time spent doing so.
Sorry, as I said your contributions are appreciated but must insist they remain related to matters within our own country.
edited by admin on 05/06/2009
|
|
|
Justice 4 Brendan
Member's Home Page
184 Posts
Member Since
20/04/2009 14:31:53
POST DATE
14/06/2009 13:11:38 |
///Good informative site with lots of stuff worth a look.
Pre-trial Preparation and Appeals for those faced with a False Accusation of a Serious Arrestable Offence
http://www.falselyxxxxaccused.co.uk/ /// If you wish to visit this site, remove the x's from the link.(Admin)
Link edited to make it unusable. We are currently in the process of writing a report regarding this website in relation to exploitation of vulnerable people, claims of expertise which we believe are impossible to make and worrying statements about getting the truth out of child witnesses. This site charges £663.88 for a consultation with no guarantee that anything further will result, should a desperate wrongly accused person be effectively conned into parting with money on the promise of results/services which are impossible to make and potentially illegal? The resulting report will probably be sent to trading standards authority for their information.
There is also an issue with practises involving the domain name, the redirection of several distinctly different domains to one site is a practise widely used by those with no other interest than to make money. If your site is called falselyaccused, it is called falsely accused, it is not therefore appropriate to redirect multiple domain names to the same site for the purpose of extracting over £600 from a desperate individual.
The simple fact is that neither the owner of this site nor anyone else can claim to be able to acquire evidence from the prosecution when others are not able to. I will end my comment with this quote "www.falselyaccused.co.uk are not Barristers or Solicitors, nor are their members attempting to show themselves as having the ability to practice law." They are not Barristers or solicitors, nor attempting to show themselves as having the ability to practice law, yet claim to be experts in instructing those who are! Enough said.
edited by admin on 14/06/2009
|
|
"I hear much of people calling to punish the guilty, but few are concerned to clear the innocent" Daniel Defoe 1661-1731
|
admin
Member's Home Page
449 Posts
Member Since
08/04/2009 08:00:00
POST DATE
14/06/2009 15:06:15 |
Sorry Brendan, we are looking with interest at this site at the moment having been sent a complaint regarding it.
|
|
|
|
UNIQUE VISITORS
FEATURED BOOK: Sandra Lean's 'No smoke, The Shocking Truth About The British Justice System'(To see all 15 5-star reveiws check 'No Smoke' as well as the full title, it is listed under both.)
|
